data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8fa1e/8fa1ef888322d315e11ad637dd0dc9197701daca" alt=""
Overall, the State Geothermal Data project that we run got glowing reviews from the external review panel - most categories were given "Outstanding" ratings. The rest of the rankings were the second tier of "Good." There were no significant criticisms. Mostly, there are questions about how we will transition the data network from development to operational status in the next year and what we can do to assist another project that is supposed to build a user interface (ie, web portal and desktop applications) for the National Geothermal Data System (NGDS).
Second, we are a subcontractor to Boise State Univ. on the original NGDS design-test project to build the data integration framework that will be used to link five independent projects into a system. We spent two days in Boise last week with university administrators, other project partners, industry consultants, and DOE program managers, to hammer out a revised plan to fast-track that project from its original 5-year timeline, to complete it in the next 15 months.
No comments:
Post a Comment